headermask image

header image

Winning the game of life: Where most people go wrong.

Winning the game of life can only be about reaching and sustaining happiness, whatever that may mean for you. Surely, there are some things you can’t do based on the laws of the land, or perhaps dictated by your conception of a higher power, but generally speaking we all ought to be pursuing happiness within the limitations of our freedom and/or independence.

You might expect that the haves are by and large much happier than the have-nots, but you’d be wrong. It turns out that study after study reports that the wealthiest nations exhibit higher rates of suicide, mental illness, and alcoholism (and other intrusive dependencies). This coincides with lower child-birth ratios and greater incidence of estranged families and solitary habitation. This marked move toward going it alone or in any case in smaller numbers strikes me as exactly the reason that most of us living in the lap of luxury just can’t seem to find happiness.

Problem #1: Lack of awareness/Lack of effort

It seems to me that most people aren’t even aware that they ought to be focused on how to achieve, or at least approach, happiness. I don’t know if the concept just seems too simplistic, or if there is perhaps a strong negative stigma attached–don’t want to be one of those happy people–but certainly a good percentage of the population in economically thriving nations are not even playing the game. In fact, I suspect that quite a lot of individuals in (over-)developed countries actually get some cynical satisfaction out of finding reasons to be unhappy, or in any case discontented.

Problem #2: Poor communication

Those who are focused on their problems and (to a lesser extent) how to solve them may find themselves talking over and over about the same recurring issues in their lives. Now these people seem to have avoided the pitfalls of Problem #1, and yet they find themselves caught in a tailspin, trying to fight an uphill battle. What are they doing wrong? First, they’re probably talking to anyone who will listen, rather than taking the time to identify individuals who might actually be able to help them. Second, they are not listening when the good advice comes their way. It’s an odd thing about being unhappy, but a great deal of the little satisfaction we do achieve is in the meticulous process of framing our problems for others. Unfortunately, I find that most people are so caught up with presenting their dilemmas in such a way as to paint themselves as infinitely worthy of pity that they are unprepared to absorb the guidance that is there before them for the taking.

It has occurred to me of late that the failure of most people in first-world countries are generally rooted in one or both of the two problems mentioned above. What’s oddly ironic is that most people fail to correct either of the two problems above, which all-too-often leads to:

Problem #3:  I got it syndrome
This is a numb state of denial that finds a person spending the better part of her/his adult life pretending to have it (at least mostly) together, tragically preempting the possibility of seeking much needed guidance and support from loved ones and perpetuating the effects of Problem #2.

This I’m a grown-up so I don’t need help from anyone attitude is at the heart of what keeps us isolated and unequipped to achieve true happiness. It’s actually a predictable consequence of the This is a free country and I’ll do as I please attitude, so it’s not terribly surprising in the U.S. and other regions where self-assertion of liberty is the norm.

Not to get all All I really need to know I learned in kindergarten on you, but isn’t this the first thing we are taught about successful interaction with others? Learn to play nice and share. Truth be told: we’d plop our kids in front of a specialist immediately if they exhibited even half the self-alienating, anti-social behavior that we adults do.

My unqualified, unsolicited advice:

Talk to the people who love you about how you might reach greater life fulfilment and what seems to be tripping you up. If you don’t feel you can approach your loved ones or others who might be able to help, fix the situation. Nothing is more important. After all, your happiness–indeed, your livelihood–depend on it.

No one has their sights set on losing the game of life, but that’s exactly what’s in store for anyone not working toward sustainable happiness.

Get on it.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

5 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Interesting post Steven, but I’m a bit troubled by your use of “winning” and “losing” here. When I hear the term “winning” I think of associated concepts like being No. 1, subsuming others, clawing your way to the top, and having the potential of losing your No. 1 perch in the future…it’s such an aggressive, selfish phrase. “Losing” too - nobody ever really “loses”. We grow from our mistakes or errors, and learn to adapt to deal with whatever weaknesses we have. If “losing” ends up killing someone, then maybe there’s no real loss, in terms of the overall gene pool.

    I would say - “Achieving Satisfaction - Where most people go wrong”…and I personally think a clear-headed reading of Marx, et al holds all the answers.

    1. Paul on August 25th, 2008 at 11:48 pm
  2. Hey Paul,

    Thanks for the comments. Glad to see that you’ve been posting to your blog too! I’m afraid I don’t agree with your interpretation of winning and losing, though I probably ought to have defined these terms more clearly above. I’m a gamer, so I have a pretty loose understanding of what winning and losing can mean. In gaming, “winning” is all about achieving the target objective within the parameters of the game by employing strategy based on calculated risks. The target objective is different for each game and defined in the rules.

    My take is that the target objective of the Game of Life is achieving sustainable happiness–or ’satisfaction,’ if you prefer. “Losing” is the failure to achieve sustainable happiness; not necessarily before others, but by the game’s at end, as it were. The upshot is that you don’t actually lose until it’s all over; you’ve got your whole life to get there, so to speak–tho I’m guessing it’s much more fun to get there sooner rather than later:-D

    Very interesting that you mention Marx. I was pretty moved by this speech a few weeks ago, and it definitely played a role in shaping some of the ideas above (and those on the way). Good call.

    Thanks again for sharing.
    Steven

    2. Steven Nishida on August 26th, 2008 at 12:12 am
  3. very informative post

    I always enjoy reading what you have to say, your words help me
    more than you know

    aunt debs

    3. Aunt Deb on August 29th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
  4. I reason that the have-nots are more inclined to be a truthful sect whereas the haves often regard the truth, on all levels, to be a nuisance; a formality during testimony.

    Those that have little are less likely to have the time, energy and wherewithal to lie about events, engage in cover-ups and/or debauch their lives whilst trying to simply live their lives. Let’s face it, very little -if anything- is prefabricated in the have-nots life. Lying isn’t viewed as a competitive sport.

    Unlike the holders of all the cards gaming one another through artifice because they can -it’s an easy form of expressive entertainment for pleasure. In fact deceit has become so commonplace among these people that it’s not only expected, it’s required. Gullible children are scorned and quickly taken to task. Gullible adults are sheep. One learns to amend the truth early on, eventually mastering the art of deception so well that they begin to believe their own press. How ironic. It’s a discretionary tactic that is socially acceptable and prevalent with an endgame of defeated character and corrupted spirit.

    Happy is not a goal, it’s a behavior. Behavior is self-controlled based on the Inner Desire (ID).

    Authentic self is the key; living it is the lock; happiness is the treasure.

    Truth is the emancipator!

    4. Jason (Yes, THAT Jason) on November 2nd, 2008 at 10:08 am
  5. Hey J,

    Great to see you back, and stoked to read your comments. Couldn’t agree more about the games that people play with one another. For those of us who learned to manipulate people and situations early, it’s all tediously transparent to witness. Been having some great discussions with a new friend about the role of trust in relationships and in the teacher-learner dynamic in particular. Honesty seems to play a big role in the interplay between trust and confidence, which are the foundation of our support networks. Truth, the emancipator…I love it!

    5. Steven Nishida on November 13th, 2008 at 10:29 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*