<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding &#8216;The Wal-Mart Effect&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/</link>
	<description>Skewered bits of what really matters.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: realityonastick</title>
		<link>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>realityonastick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Life After Sixty:

Yes, it's too bad about the decline of mom-and-pop shops in Japan. I was showing a friend around Kyoto yesterday and ran across a Starbucks in the middle of &lt;a href="http://vip.mapion.co.jp/c/f?uc=4&#38;pg=1&#38;grp=starbucks&#38;ino=BA360441" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gion!&lt;/a&gt; Truly depressing.

It looks like &lt;a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070216/walmart_japan.html?.v=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wal-Mart's heavy investment in Seiyu&lt;/a&gt; is finally starting to pay off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life After Sixty:</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s too bad about the decline of mom-and-pop shops in Japan. I was showing a friend around Kyoto yesterday and ran across a Starbucks in the middle of <a href="http://vip.mapion.co.jp/c/f?uc=4&amp;pg=1&amp;grp=starbucks&amp;ino=BA360441" rel="nofollow">Gion!</a> Truly depressing.</p>
<p>It looks like <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070216/walmart_japan.html?.v=1" rel="nofollow">Wal-Mart&#8217;s heavy investment in Seiyu</a> is finally starting to pay off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life After Sixty</title>
		<link>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Life After Sixty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I do know that the mom-and-pop shop owners associations here in Japan fought like the devil for years to keep the small business laws in force, but they eventually lost out to the large business owners.  That's when Toys R Us got the green light to open in Japan.

WalMart is not coming into Japan directly, but has invested heavily in one of the Japanese biggies -- can't remember which one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do know that the mom-and-pop shop owners associations here in Japan fought like the devil for years to keep the small business laws in force, but they eventually lost out to the large business owners.  That&#8217;s when Toys R Us got the green light to open in Japan.</p>
<p>WalMart is not coming into Japan directly, but has invested heavily in one of the Japanese biggies &#8212; can&#8217;t remember which one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realityonastick</title>
		<link>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>realityonastick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Marco:

We = Sentient consumers who can recognize the inherent dangers in allowing megaconglomerate corporations to become more powerful than the average world government.

Of course, those who hold a stake in the success of such corporations (IE. stockholders, corporate management, etc) are likely to "give a shit" only about those consumer needs that are translatable to increased business.

In any case, it would be incredibly naive to assume that corporate decision-makers could be entrusted to act conscientiously on behalf of consumers. Otherwise, we wouldn't find it necessary to invent &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU_competition_law" rel="nofollow"&gt;these EU laws&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust#Prohibited_anti-competitive_behavior" rel="nofollow"&gt;these U.S. laws&lt;/a&gt;.

So here are my questions (as clearly as possible this time):

i. Do competition and antitrust laws sufficiently protect against 'anti-competitive behavior and unfair business practices'?

ii. Do we/Does someone ( I nominate Marco;-) have to become more active in this arena?

iii. Do consumers consider the total savings on purchases from megaconglomerate corporations in retail and grocery industries to be worth the added risks associated with reduced competition? or do consumers just not 'consider' the trade off at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marco:</p>
<p>We = Sentient consumers who can recognize the inherent dangers in allowing megaconglomerate corporations to become more powerful than the average world government.</p>
<p>Of course, those who hold a stake in the success of such corporations (IE. stockholders, corporate management, etc) are likely to &#8220;give a shit&#8221; only about those consumer needs that are translatable to increased business.</p>
<p>In any case, it would be incredibly naive to assume that corporate decision-makers could be entrusted to act conscientiously on behalf of consumers. Otherwise, we wouldn&#8217;t find it necessary to invent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EU_competition_law" rel="nofollow">these EU laws</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust#Prohibited_anti-competitive_behavior" rel="nofollow">these U.S. laws</a>.</p>
<p>So here are my questions (as clearly as possible this time):</p>
<p>i. Do competition and antitrust laws sufficiently protect against &#8216;anti-competitive behavior and unfair business practices&#8217;?</p>
<p>ii. Do we/Does someone ( I nominate Marco;-) have to become more active in this arena?</p>
<p>iii. Do consumers consider the total savings on purchases from megaconglomerate corporations in retail and grocery industries to be worth the added risks associated with reduced competition? or do consumers just not &#8216;consider&#8217; the trade off at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Polo</title>
		<link>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Polo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>And what makes you think "we" (whoever they are) give a shit about "our" (whoever we are) "collective needs"? Making a lot of assumptions here, aren't "we"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what makes you think &#8220;we&#8221; (whoever they are) give a shit about &#8220;our&#8221; (whoever we are) &#8220;collective needs&#8221;? Making a lot of assumptions here, aren&#8217;t &#8220;we&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Polo</title>
		<link>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Polo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://realityonastick.com/2007/02/21/understanding-the-wal-mart-effect/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Who is "we"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is &#8220;we&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

